I am officially jumping on the HTML5 bandwagon — I know I was always a strong proponent of XHTML, but I see great potential here. I am currently reviewing HTML5: Up and Running (O’Reilly) by Mark Pilgrim, and my mind is filling up with ideas for what I can do with it. Especially the <canvas> element, oh my!
But I figured I should learn more about all of this new stuff, especially since I have reentered the programming world after an almost three year hiatus. So I am also taking a free HTML5 Mobile course from @oreillymedia and @creativeLIVE starting October 5, 2010 that runs ten weeks (until December 7, 2010). Check out the course at http://training.oreilly.com/html5mobile/.
I am at a loss for words to describe my feelings towards this announcement. Stupid money-grubbing executives…
I know I am not supposed to let the reviews of my book get to me, but I have read a couple that really bother me, and I feel I have to get some of my feelings off of my chest lest I sound off with a response directly at a reader.
First, if you are the type of person who finds it necessary to write a review that gives an awful rating, be man (or woman) enough to indicate your name and not conceal your identity behind an Anonymous Reader moniker. It must be incredibly difficult to bad mouth someone’s hard work (two years in my case) and not put your name or face out there for criticism of your own.
Third (and finally for this “petite” rant of mine), do not inconvenience yourself with writing a review when you have no sense of humor whatsoever. Now that I ponder those reviews, perhaps I should not bother evaluating the reviews from the Amazon sites in other countries. After all, Germans really do not have a sense of humor (and I will be proving my point if any Germans get upset by this remark). I was attempting to be witty and intellectual with some of my chapter and section titles – maybe I am simply too droll for the common man. Either this or my cleverness must not have translated all that well when read by people in different cultures.
So much for not attacking reviews directly! Seriously, though, is it too much to ask for better reviewers (and I would not mind better reviews either, for that matter)?
I am nearly rendered speechless by what I have just read in the latest A List Apart (Issue 251). Where did all of our common sense go? Moreover, who is paying these people anyway?
I used to view ALA as the place to go for the latest in Web culture and philosophy, and was honored when they accepted my proposal for an article, which was subsequently published in Issue 234. ALA has always had the forward thinking developers, designers, experts, etc. writing for them, and this has (I believe) given them great clout in the community. Then I read this issue…
I am struck with the sudden horror that ALA may actually be in bed with the Web-destroying behemoth itself. How is this possible? Instead of pushing developers to begin writing standards-compliant code (something I, and many other developers and writers are strong advocates for), we are instead supposed to bow to whatever fetid fancies the great and mighty Microsoft comes up with? Are they serious?
What happened to getting the browser-companies to comply with standards? Why should we, the developers, be the ones who must bend over backwards in order for our code to work — especially when our code is compliant code?
The Web is shaping up to be a Web I do not want to be a part of. The Web was innovation and art, a place where we could all come together and make a better world through technology — away from the monolithic companies that have tried to control every aspect of technology for far too many years. Now, these companies have apparently taken control of groups (or maybe just individuals — time will tell here), and with them the direction for the future of the Web.
I have always had great admiration for Eric Meyer, and I cannot believe what I have read in his article.
Let me just end by saying: STANDARDS, STANDARDS, STANDARDS!
Cow manure — that is the best way to describe the education system in this country. A big steaming pile of cow manure. I got into an argument today with my project manager and and her boss, the supervisor of quality assurance. What was the argument about, you may ask? I had built a control that was a drop-down list of the USPS state codes that was to go onto the client site where I work. It had been approved by the business unit for my project, but somehow a discussion started on whether it was a good idea to only have a two-character code as the drop-down values.
Granted, some of the territories and islands we (the United States) hold are a bit obscure, and it was probably a bit too much for me to assume that anyone would know what FM or MP stood for. (FM = Federated States of Micronesia and MP = Northern Mariana Islands for those of you playing at home.) But the argument I got into boiled down to this: They (everyone but me) thought that our clients would not know what the abbreviation for states like Missouri is, and that the only reason that all of us knew what it was (MO) was because we live in the state.
SIDEBAR: This is one hell of a bad argument for them to give me in the first place considering there are a lot of people who live in the state of Missouri who do not know how to pronounce Missouri correctly. Everyone, may I have your attention please? There is no “A” in MISSOURI. Now back to the regularly scheduled rant.
OK, here is reality check time. When do we learn the states that make up these United States of America we live in? Anyone? Anyone? By the time we are in 6th grade (I looked it up.) That’s right, by the time we are 12 years old, we are expected to know the geography of the United States, including abbreviations and capital cities.
I was basically arguing why we would expect 12 year olds to know this stuff, and yet adults (I’m assuming here) are not thought capable of such a thing. This isn’t even high school stuff, so the argument that not everyone has graduated from high school is out the door from the get go. I was told we could not assume that our clients would know this stuff. That’s fine, I thought, but why are we allowing our clients to remain “in the dark” and stupid? Why not help them by actually forcing them to learn something?
I know it is probably a pretty foreign concept and all — learning, that is. After all, if this country can allow kids to go through school without learning, why make adults learn. I’m not quite being facetious here. We try to have a “no child left behind” type of environment in our schools, and yet this type of environment is forcibly leaving children behind. I was one of those children.
We have to make sure that every kid can get an education, so we must dumb down what we learn so that even the most stupid person can still learn. What about people like me? Does the system have any idea how bored I was in grade school and high school? Does the system have any idea what I missed out on (learning-wise) because the schools were not equipped with the knowledge to teach kids like me? I took QuickBASIC in high school because that was the only course offered to me, and it was offered by a 50-something year old women who did not have a clue what it was she was teaching. Never mind that I taught myself BASIC at age 8 or 9, it did not take long before I was teaching her what to teach the class. What did I get out of that? Nothing.
I took physics in high school from a woman who did not really know the equations, had to look everything up, and “get back to us tomorrow” whenever we had a question. We taught ourselves, and tried every day to make her look the fool by asking her questions we knew she did not know. I was so frustrated, I told her where she could put her chalk (so to speak). Needless to say, I was suspended. What did I get out of that? Nothing.
Are there differences between public and private schools? I don’t think so. If nothing else, public schools are even worse. Before you argue: the public high schools where I grew up required that students take 5 courses a semester for a grand total of 40 courses — and some of these courses were shop, home economics, wood-working, underwater basket weaving, etc. I took 7 courses a semester for a grand total of 56 courses — and I never even took PE (though I was involved in sports.) I was left behind, and I took 16 more semester courses than anyone in the public school system. How many of those kids do you think were left behind?
I worry for my kids. I worry about the education they are going to receive. They are already, at three, exhibiting smarts far greater than their age, and my wife and I know they will be as smart as, but more likely smarter than us (and that is saying something — I’m not bragging here, just telling it like it is.) What are they going to do? Who is going to teach them what they need to learn when they need to learn it? Who is going to keep them from getting bored, which could lead to getting into trouble, being disruptive, etc.?
I worry for my kids, because I am about to send them through the fields filled with big piles of steaming, smelly, fly-infested manure — er, I mean school. It’s time to recycle the manure and create some energy, or at the very least, fertilizer. Smart kids will benefit from the accelerated courses and not be left behind, and dumb kids will be forced to get smarter and not be left behind, or we will be forced to sterilize them so they cannot produce more dumb kids. It’s a win-win either way. But this is my opinion, and what do I really know anyway?
For the first time since I have been working on the Web, I have heard the acronym F.A.Q. pronounced differently than I had ever heard it before. For as long as I can remember when talking to anyone about the Internet, and F.A.Q.s in particular, they have always been pronounced one way — and it is the way I think they should be pronounced.
Now, while in a job that does, I must admit, contain both technical and non-technical people in it, there is a discrepancy. At first I just ignored it, but the more I heard it pronounced in a way that I feel is wrong it began to bother me. Once I began a spirited conversation with a coworker over the pronunciation, and it ended in a no-decision. So I decided to look it up.
This is the entry for F.A.Q. in The New Hacker’s Dictionary, Third Edition by Eric S. Raymond (MIT Press, 1996) :
FAQ /F-A-Q/ or /fak/ /n./
[Usenet] 1. A Frequently Asked Question. 2. A compendium of accumulated lore, posted periodically to high-volume newsgroups in an attempt to forestall such questions. Some people prefer the term `FAQ list’ or `FAQL’ /fa’kl/, reserving `FAQ’ for sense 1.
Not a very definitive answer, as it gives two pronunciations for the acronym. Of course, this was last edited in 1996, so culture may have changed this choice by now. I continued to search and came upon this post by Eric Raymond from a USENET thread entitled Pronunciation of “FAQ”, where he wrote:
Both pronunciations are common. I believe the /F-A-Q/ pronunciation used
to predominate, and is still more common outside Internet, but has been
gradually losing ground to /fak/, which is now slightly more common on
I personally feel that the trend continued as he stated here, and that a F.A.Q. should be pronounced /fak/. But this is my opinion, and what do I really know anyway?
Oh, have I mentioned that I got a new job? Must have slipped my mind like so many other things in the past few months. So anyway.
I have a new job. Back to the world of the consultant for me, this time with SyllogisTeks. They found me a one year contract at Gateway EDI, right downtown. I get to ride the MetroLink to work again! That is an incredible load off of my mind.
Ever since the stress of my health got to me so much that I could not manage the cacophony of thoughts bursting out of my mind every second and my temper started flaring up worse than I think it ever has that driving in to work became a really Bad Thing TM. Saying that I get road rage would be a bit of an understatement. I honestly thing about running cars off of the road. That is never good.
So not having that stress on top of the rest is such a relief. Plus, I no longer have to work on His code. Let’s party over that. Also, by the end of this week, I will no longer have to refer to my company as TechPhob — though they always will be.
So there it is. I’ll be downtown at Broadway and Washington now; and what is truly hard to believe is that it will be two years (almost to the day) since I last worked downtown. Referring to my last post, where does the time go?